Skip to main content
Log in

The “flat tax(es)”: principles and experience

  • POLICY WATCH
  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews experience with the ‘flat taxes’ that have been adopted in many countries in recent years. It stresses that they differ fundamentally, and that empirical evidence on their effects is very limited. This precludes simple generalization, but several lessons emerge: there is no sign of Laffer-type behavioral responses generating revenue increases from the tax cut elements of these reforms; their impact on compliance is theoretically ambiguous, but there is evidence for Russia that compliance did improve; the distributional effects of the flat taxes are not unambiguously regressive, and in some cases, they may have increased progressivity (including through the impact on compliance); adoption of the flat tax has not resolved common challenges in taxing capital income; and it may have strengthened, not weakened, the automatic stabilizers. A key reason for adoption of the flat tax seems to have been to signal a fundamental shift toward a market-oriented policy regime. Looking forward, as the value of the signal diminishes and familiar political economy forces reassert themselves, the question is not so much whether more countries will adopt a flat tax as whether those that have will move away from it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allingham, M., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1999). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A., & Feenberg, D. (2000). The significance of federal taxes as automatic stabilizers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baturo, A., & Gray, J. (2007). Flatliners: ideology and rational learning in the diffusion of the flat tax, (Discussion Paper 210). Institute for International Integration Studies UCLA.

  • Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1995). The design of income maintenance programs. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 187–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Smart, M. (2007). Fiscal restraints and voter welfare. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 755–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., Cuff, K., & Marchand, M. (2000). Optimal income taxation with quasi-linear preferences revisited. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2, 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H., & Stuart, C. (2003). Voting and nonlinear taxes in a stylized representative democracy (CESifo Working Paper No. 1058). Munich: CESifo.

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1977). Towards a tax constitution for Leviathan. Journal of Public Economics, 8, 3255–3273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A.-M., & Leibfritz, W. (2005). Slovakia’s introduction of a flat tax as part of wider economic reforms (OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 448). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Chua, D. (2003). Tax reform in Russia. In D. Owen & D. Robinson (Eds.), Russia rebounds. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardoni, V., & Lambert, P. (1988). Welfare rankings of income distributions—a role for the variance and some insights for tax reform. Social Choice and Welfare, 5, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. B., & Hoy, M. (2002). Flat rate taxes and inequality measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mooij, R., & Nicodème, G. (2006). Corporate tax policy, entrepreneurship and incorporation in the EU (CESifo Working Paper 1883).

  • Diamond, P. (1998). Optimal Income taxation: an example with a U-shaped pattern of marginal rates. American Economic Review, 88, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., & Keen, M. (1996). Tax competition and leviathan. European Economic Review, 40, 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddy, C. G., & Gale, W. G. (2005). Demythologizing the Russian Flat Tax. Tax Notes International, March 14, 983–988.

  • Goolsbee, A. (1999). Evidence on the high-income Laffer-curve from six decades of tax reform, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 1–64.

  • Hall, R. E., & Rabushka, A. (1983). Low tax, simple tax, flat tax. New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. E., & Rabushka, A. (1985). The flat tax. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, R., & Keen, M. (1983). Single-crossing conditions in comparisons of tax progressivity. Journal of Public Economics, 20, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks, J., Keen, M., & Muthoo, A. (1999). Corruption, extortion, and evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 74, 395–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, A., Keen, M., & Klemm, A. (2005). The Russian “flat tax” reform. Economic Policy, 20, 397–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, U. (1976). On the measurement of the degree of progression. Journal of Public Economics, 5, 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R., Keen, M., & Tuomala, M. (1994). Optimal nonlinear income taxation for income poverty alleviation. European Economic Review, 38, 1613–1632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., Kim, Y., & Varsano, R. (2006). The “flat tax(es)”: principles and evidence (IMF Working Paper 06/218). Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  • Lambert, P. (1993). The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, T. (2006). A flat tax in Denmark? IB Revija, XXXX, 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P. (2000). Three Centuries of Inequality in Britain and America. In A.B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (1999). Explaining the increase in inequality during the transition (Mimeo, World Bank Policy Research Department). Washington: World Bank.

  • Mikloš, I., Jakoby, M., & Morvay, K. (2005). Tax reform in the Slovak Republic. CESifo DICE Report, 3, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic (2005). First year of the tax reform, or 19 percent at work, Economic Analysis 8.

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. J. (2005). Eastern Europe’s flat tax revolution, Tax Notes International, March 14, 989–990.

  • Moore, D. (2005). Slovakia’s tax and welfare reforms (IMF Working Paper 05/133). Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  • Murphy, R. (2006). Flat tax: not as simple as they’d have you think. IB Revija, XXXX, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peichl, A. (2006). The distributional effects of a flat tax reform in Germany—a microsimulation analysis. IB Revija, XXXX, 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, M. (1995). Why are taxes so high in egalitarian countries? Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 569–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive? In D. Bradford (Ed.) Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol. 5, pp. 145–164.

  • Price Waterhouse (1996). Individual Taxes, 1996.

  • Roberts, K. (1977). Voting over income tax schedules. Journal of Public Economics, 8, 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roine, J. (2006). The political economics of not paying taxes. Public Choice, 126, 107–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saez, E. (2001). Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Review of Economic Studies, 68, 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saez, E. (2002). Optimal income transfer programs: intensive versus extensive labor supply responses. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1039–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1983). Progressive taxation, redistribution, and labor supply. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 85, 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinelnikov-Mourylev, S., Batkibekov, S., Kadotchnikov, P., & Nekipelov, D. (undated). Income tax reform in the Russian Federation: an estimation of the outcomes. Moscow: Institute for Economies in Transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J. (2001). A general model of the behavioral response to taxation. International Tax and Public Finance, 8, 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J., Yitzhaki, S., Mayshar, J., & Lundholm, M. (1994). The optimal two-bracket linear income tax. Journal of Public Economics, 53, 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephanyan, V. (2003). Reforming tax systems: experience of the Baltics, Russia, and other countries of the former Soviet Union (IMF Working Paper 03/173). Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  • Teather, R. (2005). A flat tax for the UK—a practical reality (Briefing). London: Adam Smith Institute.

  • Tuomala, M. (1990). Optimal Income Tax and Redistribution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, The quest for equitable growth in the Slovak Republic (Report No. 32433_SK). Washington: World Bank.

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1974). A note on ‘income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis’. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 201–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Keen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keen, M., Kim, Y. & Varsano, R. The “flat tax(es)”: principles and experience. Int Tax Public Finance 15, 712–751 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9050-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-007-9050-z

Keywords

JEL

Navigation