Controversial 105 Keefer Chinatown development re-submitted to council
Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.
Article content
A controversial development in Chinatown that had divided the community will be put forward to the city of Vancouver once again in what’s believed to be the fifth attempt to get the project underway.
In a statement released Friday, Beedie Living announced it had made changes to its plans and had submitted an amended application for its Chinatown project at 105 Keefer St.
“This revised version responds to what we heard from city council and the public over more than four years of community consultation and most recently the public hearing at City Hall,” it read.
Some of the feedback received by the developer noted the proposed building was too tall and that the building wasn’t in line with the history and-or heritage of Chinatown.
Beedie’s statement explained the plans had been revised to lower the building’s height from 115 feet to 90 feet, while the section along Columbia Street would be lowered to 70 feet, to maintain views of Dr. Sun Yat Sen Garden.
The statement also addressed concerns about whether the building could maintain the culture of Chinatown; developers are now promising to “provide important subsidized cultural ground-floor space and increased pedestrianization of the Chinatown Memorial Plaza.”
“We see the Keefer project as an important addition to Chinatown,” Houtan Rafii, Beedie’s vice-president of residential development, said in a news release.
“We have been listening to the concerns people have expressed and sincerely appreciate every stakeholder who has collaborated with us toward the evolution of the proposal. We truly hope that this new proposal will reflect, as much as possible, the diverse perspectives we have heard.”
The site is currently home to a parking lot and what used to be a gas station.
Last month, following 26 hours of council debate and public hearings over the course of three weeks, Vancouver city council voted 8-3 to reject the project, noting the building’s height, its lack of adequate social housing, and the outpouring of community opposition.
The head of #SaveChinatownYVR, a group of community members who have been active in the battle against 105 Keefer St., says Beedie failed to properly consult with the community before resubmitting its application.
“Beedie says they are trying to achieve the highest level of sensitivity for Chinatown at that site but it’s not about sensitivity — it’s about respect,” said Melody Ma. “That they would go ahead with this reapplication without consulting with the community at large shows that they are not demonstrating respect. They have already broken trust with the community.”
Ma is also concerned that project was re-submitted ahead of the city of Vancouver’s Chinatown-wide zoning policy update which is expected to be released in the fall.
Beedie had initially applied for rezoning to allow for a 12-storey mixed-use building on Keefer Street, with commercial spaces on the first floor, 25 units of social housing and 106 market condos. Beedie didn’t reveal how many units — either condos or social housing — were included in its revised application.
The developer also did not release any renderings of the redesigned building, but said it will feature a re-imagined exterior design that reflects the context and rich heritage of the area.”
No one from Beedie was available for comment on Friday.
City staff had initially recommended council approve the rezoning because it was in tune with the city’s Chinatown neighbourhood plan.
Mayor Gregor Robertson voted against the proposal, saying: “It cuts far too deep a divide in the community to advance and see this built.”
“The message has been sent that you need to include the community before you even start to think about what you are going to build,” Ma said. “The community and the neighbourhood will have to live with whatever is built there for a very long time, so we need to have community input before we have something prescribed for us.”
Andy Yan, who was critical of Beedie’s previous proposal for 105 Keefer, hasn’t seen the new plans but is interested to see what the developer learned from its failed application.
“Developers in this city are moving into places that have established neighbours who have been there for a very long time. It is going to be incumbent on those developers to show an increased level of engagement and flexibility to those neighbours,” said Yan. “We will see what they pitch and how it fits into the long-established guidelines for the community.”
CLICK HERE to report a typo.
Is there more to this story? We’d like to hear from you about this or any other stories you think we should know about. Email vantips@postmedia.com
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.