Nuts in November: Question 4, Nadine, Tell Us About Paul

Running a bit late. Sorry folks. A trip to Hazel Grove yesterday was very mellow and fruitful. And Google action has been bracing, needing a resolute approach, but turned out nice. But we did promise a Question 4 for Nadine in the Nuts in November series. And we did suggest in various tweets that Nadine's erstwhile partner Paul Dorries would be a feature.

I'll warn you now Nadine. This is an easy peasy question, with a supplementary of equal facility. We've reviewed the news trail you leave behind you and we must confess we're finding some of the Bargery/Dorries PR and myth-making hard to penetrate.

Question 4 We're confused Nadine. Apparently you got married to Paul Dorries in Africa some 25 years ago and immediately carried the blushing groom over the threshold back to England. How did that work then? Was there a real wedding? A white wedding perhaps? Do you have pictures? I made my commitments in jeans myself, there's no shame in that. I'll show you mine etc. Or was it some kind of $50 Reno quickie elopement ship's captain thingie? Please don't be offended. We're only asking.

Question 4a, Supplementary We're still confused Nadine. Are you and Paul divorced as some stories have it? Or just separated as others say? Or more properly estranged? Or still in many respects part of the same unit? How on earth have you disentangled your family finances? And can it be right that your oppo has been getting some form of alimony/palimony out of your parliamentary pay and allowances? As you hinted manfully as the Telegraph pushed for answers? Has Paul Dorries ever been on the Dorries MumP taxpayer payroll?

Or is it perhaps just a case of main home/second home child minding, main home/second home house sitting, main home/second home dog walking as LOL have stated every now and then?

A lot of questions Nadine. Good value this Nuts in November project. Please do your best.

Drafted 4 November, tweaked this morning. With a good deal now carried over for subsequent Nuts in November questions.

We plan to add a pic or two and perhaps some links later. Above, actual Zambia wedding picture. Note the elephants are NOT "in the room".

Nuts in November: Nadine Dorries Mum-P "Uncooperative"? Never!

Having been the crowd sourcer who alerted the Guardian to Ms Nadine Bargery-Dorries Mum-P and inter-alia a terse note from the Fees Office it is with some chagrin that I see Sunny Hundal spilling the beans ahead of me on Liberal Conspiracy, as indeed have The Guardian. Never mind. I've been dragging my feet until I can hopefully reveal the whole "homes and gardens" magic that is Ms Bargery-Dorries Mum-P's speciality.

Here's their collected works:

What did Nadine Dorries MP spend £9000 on?

by Sunny H
December 18, 2009 at 9:32 am

The Guardian’s outsourcing of MP’s expenses to readers uncovered this gem:

When Tory MP Nadine Dorries, submitted a £9,000 claim last year, a House of Commons official wrote on the form: “Due to lack of cooperation by member, assumption that costs relate to (blanked out) address, as stated on ACA nomination”.
Another official added: “ok to proceed”. Dorries declined to explain what the note meant.

£9,000 is a significant amount of money. What was it for, any ideas readers?

It’s also significant the official wrote: ‘due to lack of cooperation by member‘, which suggests a degree of unwillingness by Nadine Dorries to be open about her expenses. Or perhaps we have this wrong and she declared it elsewhere?

Nevertheless, anyone know what this is for?

Also, odd that a sum that big wasn’t picked up by libertarian blogs that have so far tended to jump on big number expenses.

As Ms Nadine Bargery-Dorries Mum-P is my Mastermind specialist subject I am able to assist on this one:

This note is a reference to the fact that Nadine Dorries Mum-P has refused to co-operate and tell the Fees Office or anyone where her "main home" actually is. She just says it's "somewhere else". Usually with some formulation about protecting the privacy of her daughters, plural. And she might add her "ex" Paul David Dorries who is as we have revealed elsewhere in our Nuts in November series a man in demand. Albeit with a handy getaway car.

Although in her rather flustered and unintentionally revelatory response to Telegraph queries Ms Nadine Bargery-Dorries Mum-P claimed she had squared all this secrecy with the fees office. That was it seems a bit of a fib. Why on earth would they let one MP make themselves an exceptional case and not disclose confidentially to them where her main home was?

For the moment they have been going along with her assurance that this "main home" is "somewhere else". I'm 99% certain that I know the front running candidate for where this is, co-conspirators have even visited the address, though alas the cockbird had flown his nest. If I'm correct I can assure readers that Nadine Dorries scarcely spends any time there at all.

Even less now daughter 3 - Cassandra, named from the Greek Κασσάνδρα, "she who entangles men" and a great but accurséd to be unbelieved harbinger of disaster (wiki) - is based in Woburn.

Nadine Dorries Mum-P has of course admitted these factuals. Admitted that her main home for allowances purposes is NOT her main home for reality purposes. In fact whichever address she is imagining to be her "main home" is not one she spends any great length of time in at all. That her "second home" is by her own admission by far and away the one where she mainly spends her life.

LOL would be willing to wager, ooooh £5, that following proper pro-rata'ing as a "second home", and subtraction of any relevant state benefits that may have accrued, that this other address would produce a rather disappointing return compared to the Woburn address and its £18,000 per annum plus plus plus. Where the taxpayer are footing the entire lifestyle bill.

Potentially Ms Dorries has had several years of "second home" allowances when she does not have a "main home" that answers the tests for that status i.e. being her main home in any sense of the term. In which her "second home" however did and does fit the definitions for a genuine "main home". This is what the Telegraph were pushing at. This is what the Fees Office really ought to have been pushing at too.

Completely unacceptable lack of accountability.

The £9000 is I believe half a year's worth of in advance rent at her "second home" which is of course in Woburn, Mid Narnia.

Although Nadine hasn't flipped between "main" and "second" homes she and/or her connections have sold at least THREE UK properties since 2005. Some scope for playing with the tax treatment on those, but all a bit mysterious, business premises, charges from banks (still current according to Companies House), PR spin in the Times Property, sales way below her supposed asking price, some very wretched "improvements" including a huge uPVC and polycarbon conservatory on a supposedly 1340 house, and so on and so forth.

The family holiday home / investment in South Africa has fallen out of her declaration of late. Ands strictly speaking all three, certainly two, Chipping Camden homes should have probably been declared in that too. And at least one directorship (Co now struck off) probably also ought to have been in there. A property development company.

Time to continue with Nuts in November methinks. Do the property stuff today perhaps? And then move on to some of the visible and not so visible business activities.

I'll come back and questionise most of this and more when I'm back from dogging on the meadows, in the orchards and on the banks. I'll have my mobile with me fun seekers, co conspirators and Nadine well wishers. Meanwhile please do some revision on the story so far.

Nadine Dorries MP, How Very Could You? Q48-50 redux, Q90-100

LOL are re-opening our enquiries by re-blogging the entire "Nuts in November" oeuvre. This one first appeared at 23.28 on 1 December 2009:

It was 40 questions ago in the Nuts in November series that we introduced the news that the Mum-P Nadine V Dorries née Bargery was in effect caught up, for richer or poorer, with a former Copper Mining Engineer Paul David Dorries who had turned his hand via various enterprises, none of which he was particularly trained for, mostly indeed exclusively in private companies involving only himself and/or the Mum-P Nadine as Director-Shareholders, to an enterprise involving other people's money, other people's risk, and as it goes other people's losses.

Or so it would seem. Here's a little flashback:

Question 48: We've asked before. But do tell us more about Paul David Dorries? Perhaps you can begin with an answer to this request. That is your Paul Dorries isn't it? We'll call it Question 48:

For the sake of the bots and arachnids crawling the web we'll spell out the content at this point. The illustration is a screengrab from a new forum for journalists at Journalism.co.uk and is a post headed "Paul Dorries and Investment Advice". The writer is a newbie and this was their only post ever at the time of grabbing. They called themselves "Chamber" and it was around 3pm on September 16 this year when they wrote:

I am currently researching a story on a Mr Paul Dorries and investment advice given by him. Does any other member have anything they think may be of use to the story?

So far, so coy. And then there was our follow up:

Question 49: And while we're at it we'll call this one Question 49. You must be very proud of Paul David Dorries leaving behind his Copper Mining history and retraining as an investment adviser? Presumably he did retrain and did get accreditation and a licence?:

Which screengrab is from The Motley Fool which is a famous site dedicated "To Educate, Amuse and Enrich". The message so grabbed is on a forum called "Investors' Roundtable" sub-section "A Fool and His Money ..." and had been posted about three hours before, with the same heading, and clearly by the same individual. This time tagged: "Chamberint". It said:

To all fool members, if there's anyone out there who has had any business dealings with, and particularly investment advice from a gentleman by the name of PAUL DORRIES, then please get in contact with me via this board. I would love too (sic) hear your story.

Alongside the message in the grab there happens to be a Motley Fool announcement: Boiler Rooms FAQ Cold-called by someone selling a sure-fire investment? This is against the FSA's rules. Check this FAQ for detailed advice and, if in doubt, just hang up! (Updated: 8 Oct 06) with the next announcement headed How to Spot an Investment Scam (Podcast). This was the environment in which Paul Dorries was being investigated.

Although LOL could take the Runnings of the Dorries Family as our Mastermind specialist subject we were not "Chamber" or "Chamberint". And nor was it the News of the World as one commenter suggested, picking up a hint from some careless (?) tweet of ours. Though the News of the World did know at that point that there was a story to be had. But it wasn't them. We went on:

Question 50: And this intriguing follow up can be Question 50. Seems he isn't actually accredited or any of that red tape pallaver? Can you help? Are these assertions about Paul's methods true do you think?

For sure, this was the point where LOL's stuff pricked up. Ears. The follow up post at the Fool.co.uk rip-off section was again from Chamberint. It was sent the very next day. Just before elevenses. There were signs of a sugar slump. Chamberint said:

I am UK based, and have checked that Mr Dorries is not registered to give investment advice.
It seems that Mr dorries works for himself.
I have a group of people who have all paid money into Mr Dorries' bank accounts and seen nothing in return.
They also seemed to have been duped into Spread betting type contracts, sold as surefire cannot drop investments.
I would love to speak to anyone else who has had dealings with this man.

Of course, the "surefire cannot drop investment" line - copper-bottomed you might say - chimes with the Boiler House announcement doesn't it? But we also know that this man, known as Paul Dorries, and I can exclusively confirm despite the Mum-Ps lack of responses that her ex- is the only relevant Paul Dorries on the block who might be referred to in this question. Do tell us if that's not right Nadine. Or Paul.

So, if it's alright, we'll get back to the main Nuts in November series and ask some more Questions:

Question 90: Clearly Nadine you are aware of this Chamber/Chamberint character. And their clients too. Would you like to tell the LOL readers who they are and what they are about?

Question 91: Or would you prefer LOL to explain and provide contact their contact details for any reader interested in sharing their experiences of Paul Dorries investment advice?

Question 92: We'll come back to that. In the meantime can you provide an estimate of the number of times you have been apprised by phone and text and letter and whatever of your chum and former bedfellow Paul Dorries' modus operandi and of the losses that have been suffered?

Question 93: Here's one for the general readership. If you had to guess the type of investor recruited by Mr Paul Dorries to his surefire investments who also contacted Chamberint, whatever that is, which of the following categories would you choose?
(a) Hardened and extremely wealthy gamblers who can afford to lose five, six and seven figure sums who understand that when an amateur and inexperienced advisor says "surefire cannot drop investments" or "copper-bottomed" they're expecting you to know in your heart of hearts that it's really a huge risk;
(b) Cautious folk who scrutinise everything they consider, use due diligence at every turn, would have at least checked how many sets of annual accounts Paul Dorries had submitted per enterprise, and were generally savvy investors;
(c) Hardened but extremely poor gamblers who have already lost far more than they can afford but can always scam together some cash for a surefire cannot lose investment;
(d) Widows spending far more than they can afford in an attempt to safely recover their comforts after their man deceased; flattered by attention from an MP consort, albeit balding, 5 feet 11 inches, a bit war torn, and "rather rough";
(e) All of the above. Except (b).

Question 94: All of the above (except b) may be right of course but if you had to guess Nadine which group would be making a fuss which would you say? And if you chose (d) Widows in the lurch would you guess that none of the losers had been approached:
(a) For at least three or four years;
(b) For two years at the very least;
(c) Oh go on! After a year would be fine;
(d) For six months, why not;
(e) After three or four weeks;

Question 95: Right, back to the who are these Chamber/Chamberint folk question. Are they:
(a) Police officers;
(b) Customs and Excise officers;
(c) Inland Revenue investigators;
(d) Drug squad;
(e) Forensic accountants;
(f) Private investigators;
(g) The Fees Office;
(h) The Commissioner for Standards;
(i) The Financial Services Agency;

Question 96: Though there's no discounting the possibility that all these groups might be interested in investigating Paul David Dorries, or not, we'll have to admit, as Nadine Mum-P knows, that Chamber/Chamberint are private detectives hired by some of the investment losers. Ain't that the case Nadine?

Question 97: In fact there have been quite a few inward calls to the Mum-P Nadine Dorries requesting that she assist in investigations. Is that right Nadine?

Question 98: And at least one of the victims of terrible, unlicenced, unregulated, but at times dirty flirty, Paul Dorries investment advice has written to the Tory would be Prime Minister and flim flam merchant David Cameron and asked for his support in recovering their funds and preventing any repetition of such things. Ain't that right?

Question 99: And they got a letter back didn't they Nadine? Saying that what you and your family got up to in your own time was a matter for yourselves? Or words to that effect?

Question 100: There are lots more questions of course Nadine. Though our month is up we're hardly started. But let's have a suitable 100th question. The Tories have suggested that Labour have allowed the Financial Services industry to take the piss. Ridiculous given that Tories have generally spoken out against regulation at every level.
How embarrassing is it that a Mum-P's partner with no training or experience or expertise in investment has avoided FSA regulation by talking investors into granting him powers of attorney? And then lost all their money? Yet been paid hefty commissions? Is this the Tory model for the future?

Nuts in November: Nadine, Q48-50 redux and Q90-100 as well

It was 40 questions ago in the Nuts in November series that we introduced the news that the Mum-P Nadine V Dorries née Bargery was in effect caught up, for richer or poorer, with a former Copper Mining Engineer Paul David Dorries who had turned his hand via various enterprises, none of which he was particularly trained for, mostly indeed exclusively in private companies involving only himself and/or the Mum-P Nadine as Director-Shareholders, to an enterprise involving other people's money, other people's risk, and as it goes other people's losses.

Or so it would seem. Here's a little flashback:

Question 48: We've asked before. But do tell us more about Paul David Dorries? Perhaps you can begin with an answer to this request. That is your Paul Dorries isn't it? We'll call it Question 48:

For the sake of the bots and arachnids crawling the web we'll spell out the content at this point. The illustration is a screengrab from a new forum for journalists at Journalism.co.uk and is a post headed "Paul Dorries and Investment Advice". The writer is a newbie and this was their only post ever at the time of grabbing. They called themselves "Chamber" and it was around 3pm on September 16 this year when they wrote:

I am currently researching a story on a Mr Paul Dorries and investment advice given by him. Does any other member have anything they think may be of use to the story?

So far, so coy. And then there was our follow up:

Question 49: And while we're at it we'll call this one Question 49. You must be very proud of Paul David Dorries leaving behind his Copper Mining history and retraining as an investment adviser? Presumably he did retrain and did get accreditation and a licence?:

Which screengrab is from The Motley Fool which is a famous site dedicated "To Educate, Amuse and Enrich". The message so grabbed is on a forum called "Investors' Roundtable" sub-section "A Fool and His Money ..." and had been posted about three hours before, with the same heading, and clearly by the same individual. This time tagged: "Chamberint". It said:

To all fool members, if there's anyone out there who has had any business dealings with, and particularly investment advice from a gentleman by the name of PAUL DORRIES, then please get in contact with me via this board. I would love too (sic) hear your story.

Alongside the message in the grab there happens to be a Motley Fool announcement: Boiler Rooms FAQ Cold-called by someone selling a sure-fire investment? This is against the FSA's rules. Check this FAQ for detailed advice and, if in doubt, just hang up! (Updated: 8 Oct 06) with the next announcement headed How to Spot an Investment Scam (Podcast). This was the environment in which Paul Dorries was being investigated.

Although LOL could take the Runnings of the Dorries Family as our Mastermind specialist subject we were not "Chamber" or "Chamberint". And nor was it the News of the World as one commenter suggested, picking up a hint from some careless (?) tweet of ours. Though the News of the World did know at that point that there was a story to be had. But it wasn't them. We went on:

Question 50: And this intriguing follow up can be Question 50. Seems he isn't actually accredited or any of that red tape pallaver? Can you help? Are these assertions about Paul's methods true do you think?

For sure, this was the point where LOL's stuff pricked up. Ears. The follow up post at the Fool.co.uk rip-off section was again from Chamberint. It was sent the very next day. Just before elevenses. There were signs of a sugar slump. Chamberint said:

I am UK based, and have checked that Mr Dorries is not registered to give investment advice.
It seems that Mr dorries works for himself.
I have a group of people who have all paid money into Mr Dorries' bank accounts and seen nothing in return.
They also seemed to have been duped into Spread betting type contracts, sold as surefire cannot drop investments.
I would love to speak to anyone else who has had dealings with this man.

Of course, the "surefire cannot drop investment" line - copper-bottomed you might say - chimes with the Boiler House announcement doesn't it? But we also know that this man, known as Paul Dorries, and I can exclusively confirm despite the Mum-Ps lack of responses that her ex- is the only relevant Paul Dorries on the block who might be referred to in this question. Do tell us if that's not right Nadine. Or Paul.

So, if it's alright, we'll get back to the main Nuts in November series and ask some more Questions:

Question 90: Clearly Nadine you are aware of this Chamber/Chamberint character. And their clients too. Would you like to tell the LOL readers who they are and what they are about?

Question 91: Or would you prefer LOL to explain and provide contact their contact details for any reader interested in sharing their experiences of Paul Dorries investment advice?

Question 92: We'll come back to that. In the meantime can you provide an estimate of the number of times you have been apprised by phone and text and letter and whatever of your chum and former bedfellow Paul Dorries' modus operandi and of the losses that have been suffered?

Question 93: Here's one for the general readership. If you had to guess the type of investor recruited by Mr Paul Dorries to his surefire investments who also contacted Chamberint, whatever that is, which of the following categories would you choose?
(a) Hardened and extremely wealthy gamblers who can afford to lose five, six and seven figure sums who understand that when an amateur and inexperienced advisor says "surefire cannot drop investments" or "copper-bottomed" they're expecting you to know in your heart of hearts that it's really a huge risk;
(b) Cautious folk who scrutinise everything they consider, use due diligence at every turn, would have at least checked how many sets of annual accounts Paul Dorries had submitted per enterprise, and were generally savvy investors;
(c) Hardened but extremely poor gamblers who have already lost far more than they can afford but can always scam together some cash for a surefire cannot lose investment;
(d) Widows spending far more than they can afford in an attempt to safely recover their comforts after their man deceased; flattered by attention from an MP consort, albeit balding, 5 feet 11 inches, a bit war torn, and "rather rough";
(e) All of the above. Except (b).

Question 94: All of the above (except b) may be right of course but if you had to guess Nadine which group would be making a fuss which would you say? And if you chose (d) Widows in the lurch would you guess that none of the losers had been approached:
(a) For at least three or four years;
(b) For two years at the very least;
(c) Oh go on! After a year would be fine;
(d) For six months, why not;
(e) After three or four weeks;

Question 95: Right, back to the who are these Chamber/Chamberint folk question. Are they:
(a) Police officers;
(b) Customs and Excise officers;
(c) Inland Revenue investigators;
(d) Drug squad;
(e) Forensic accountants;
(f) Private investigators;
(g) The Fees Office;
(h) The Commissioner for Standards;
(i) The Financial Services Agency;

Question 96: Though there's no discounting the possibility that all these groups might be interested in investigating Paul David Dorries, or not, we'll have to admit, as Nadine Mum-P knows, that Chamber/Chamberint are private detectives hired by some of the investment losers. Ain't that the case Nadine?

Question 97: In fact there have been quite a few inward calls to the Mum-P Nadine Dorries requesting that she assist in investigations. Is that right Nadine?

Question 98: And at least one of the victims of terrible, unlicenced, unregulated, but at times dirty flirty, Paul Dorries investment advice has written to the Tory would be Prime Minister and flim flam merchant David Cameron and asked for his support in recovering their funds and preventing any repetition of such things. Ain't that right?

Question 99: And they got a letter back didn't they Nadine? Saying that what you and your family got up to in your own time was a matter for yourselves? Or words to that effect?

Question 100: There are lots more questions of course Nadine. Though our month is up we're hardly started. But let's have a suitable 100th question. The Tories have suggested that Labour have allowed the Financial Services industry to take the piss. Ridiculous given that Tories have generally spoken out against regulation at every level.
How embarrassing is it that a Mum-P's partner with no training or experience or expertise in investment has avoided FSA regulation by talking investors into granting him powers of attorney? And then lost all their money? Yet been paid hefty commissions? Is this the Tory model for the future?

Nuts in November: Question 1, Nadine, What is Jenny's Pay?

As LOL revealed exclusively HERE last Wednesday and followed up HERE last Thursday Ms Nadine Dorries MP has followed up her employment of one Philippa Dorries on the taxpayer with employment of one Jennifer Dorries on the taxpayer. And the common surnames are not in fact a coincidence. They are all related!

LOL published the story at this point because Nadine had swiftly tweet-responded to a comment we made over at Lord Dale's Diary. She would also go on to spoon-fed a rather positive spin of the story to Paul Waugh of the Standard. Building on her tweeted story of an attempted £250 retainer from a journalist, which completely failed, but which nonetheless, she says, pushed her into employing family members. Not logical exactly. But that doesn't mean it's not true.

Kevin Maguire of the Mirror posted that the supposed senior broadsheet journalist who had supposedly tried this supposed sourcing said the story was completely and utterly untrue. Nadine's word against theirs. I wonder. Journalist vs MumP? It's not an easy one to call.

But the Sunday Mirror followed up and followed through. To a point.

This new appointment is not in the least bit apparent from Part Two of the Register of Members Interests editions dated either 2 September 2009 (html) or 14 October 2009 (pdf). But habeus corpus! Young Jennifer turned up in person at the start of the session. What's more she was, we're told by co-conspirators, the life and soul of the Sports and Social on Friday 9 October Friday 16 October.

This of course being the bar where the ill-used and generally ill-paid researcherati, and spectacularly so internerati, do gather of a Friday evening. To get bevvied as it goes. On Tax-payer subsidised brews, fermentations and distillations.

With she confesses "not a political bone in my body" young Jennifer is it seems blessed with no tribal feelings or sectarianism whatsoever. An appealing trait and even perhaps a good start for a Young Socialist. But I digress. Jen also appears to have little or no "nous" as sayeth we Mancurians (tm @ToryBear).

She was happy to be everyone's mate and they hers. Until that is the hoi polloi became slightly less sure that she was indeed just like them. Apart from not giving a flying fig about politics, which is the average bag carrier's life blood. As the precocious Jennifer revealed her absolute glee at her very generous terms and conditions. And her being so generally unskilled, unknowing and inexperienced to boot.

Only three months before, on Friday 6 July at 6:33pm Jennifer's own MumP ("Mum-pee" please, not "mump") Ms Nadine Dorries had risen to her feet in the Commons Chamber and combined great joy at Jennifer's degree result and great sadness at her probable fate, never getting a job but forever saddled with student debt. Whatever was she to do with her poor daughter? Well worth a read. No published video or audio I can find at the moment.

But no! No need to worry at all!! Jennifer Dorries has been able to enjoy a lovely summer break after graduation and to return to a plum job, working for her MumP. So here's the question, and the supplementary:

Question 1: Nadine, Jennifer claimed, amongst her peers, that she was being paid some £50,000. As you can imagine this was a quite astonishing claim and her new mates, thinking she might be getting mixed up or pulling their legs, asked her to explain how this could possibly be. Obviously she may have been mixed up or exaggerating or whatever, but this is certainly what she was heard to say, and not just once.
She apparently also said that her MumP was swinging this by putting her in charge of not only her Westminster office replacing her big sister Philippa 1, but also her constituency office, replacing her big sister's namesake (no relation) Philippa 2.
Meanwhile the Mirror's hacks have split the difference between what they think are the top and bottoms of the scale for Office Manager / Executive Secretary (the top of the tree) and arrived at an estimate of £28,000 per annum. Though their figures were not up-to-date with the real mid-point now being around £30,700. Other scales are there too btw. Check the ranges for bog-standard researcher and caseworker.
Which is correct? £28,000 for the one job? or £50,000 for the both as Jennifer was saying down the SandS? The stone proof of course will be in the correspondence with the pass office and the fees office, the staff registrations, the requisitions, and the payslips which you are welcome to produce at this point should you wish. Then we can all be very clear on all this. Then all the he said she said she said he said would become quite irrelevant.

Q1a the supplementary: Post Conway and Post Telegraph and Mid Legg and Pre Kelly how did you, Nadine, think it would look employing a series of Little Dorrieses in this way? Where's the meritocracy in that? Isn't there some rule about value for money? When the usual starting pay for a Politics or Economics or similar Graduate, often with an MA and an intense interest in Party Politics is in fact £18,000 or thereabouts. Why would you pay so much more? Some even "pay to play" as long-term interns. Perhaps £25,000 at an absolute stretch. How on earth did you think this would look to the public? Already so very angry about you MPs and your liberties?

This is the first of Nadine's 30 Daily Questions for LOL's squirelling away "Nuts in November" series. There'll be two tomorrow to catch up for yesterday. If you know any MPs who have taken on rellies in a similar way, if it were possible - Post Conway, Post Telegraph, Mid Legg or Pre Kelly please do let us know. Irrespective of party we'll take a look. Thanks.



UPDATE Tue 21:08: Just checked submitted evidence and find the date of the great unburdening of the MumP's Number 2 daughter was on Friday 16 October going on Saturday 17 October, not Friday 9 October. Apologies.

Nadine Dorries MP, How Very Could You? Q1-5 Mum-P, Marriage, Mauling MPs

Appeared in this form in the Nuts in November series on 8 November 2009 and as five posts between 2nd and 6th.


Ms Nadine Dorries MP has probably been Labour of Love's most popular feedback area, ever. We've been saving up lots of interesting questions for a rainy day. Or a rainy month even.

The number of "well wishers" round the place who want to send their blessings to Our Nadine is truly staggering. Our Paul is also staggeringly popular in many quarters. Though a bit of a will-o-the-wisp web-wise. LOL are putting together a month's worth of Questions for the Mum-P for Mid Bedfordshire. Counting properly we are probably already in double figures.

But, so far, organised in five clusters:

Question 1: This Session you have added a second arguably unsuitable Dorries daughter to the taxpayers' payroll. Jennifer, for it is she, enthusiastically reported a £50,000 salary as some kind of Chief of Staff with roles in both Westminster and Woburn.
The Sunday Mirror a week ago speculated a lower figure, which seems a bit rude actually, though it was still high for normal candidates. Though for a sought after candidate of Jenny's merits you might well break the bank. How much is Jenny paid?

Supplementary: How on earth mid-Legg mid-Kelly, post-Conway, post-Telegraph did you expect this to look?

Question 2: Jennifer's appointment does show up in the latest staff RMI but strangely not in the Mum-Ps own returns for 2 September or 14 October. Meanwhile Philippa is away travelling in Australia but appears in both these Mum-P RMI Part Twos as a current employee. Is this incompetence or chicanery?

Question 3: Who Wants to be a Millionaire homage. Fastest finger first. Put the following in the correct order:

A. Philippa Storm Dorries gave notice of a year-long trip to Australia and needed to be replaced as Office Manager/Senior Secretary/Chief of Staff;

B. Mum-P Nadine Dorries made an impassioned speech in the House, drawing attention to the plight of young unemployable daughter newly-graduated daughter, that was at 6:33pm on 06-07-09;

C. There was a "well-earned" Dorries Family Holiday. ¡Y Viva Espana!;

D. Jennifer Lauren Dorries turned up in the Sports and Social on Friday 16 October, Miss Hospitality personified, and she'd landed a bloody good job.

Question 4: Leaving aside your earlier CV for the time being you went to Zambia and bumped into your old friend Paul Dorries and you returned to the UK apparently newly married and very ready to start a family. Was this a traditional marriage and in a style and jurisdiction recognised here in the UK?
Would you say?

Supplementary: All kinds of online biographies, CVs, blurbs, news stories and so on refer to a change in marital status in December 2006. Divorce, separation, or if you will estrangement. Which is it actually? And are you still in regular touch?

Question 5: Given that your secret and open career history include being a flight attendant and some kind of nurse, surely two of the most pawed, arse-slapped and generally harassed occupations, alongside being a Mum-P, why would you stick up for hands-on dirt-ball sleaze scoundrel Sir Nick Winterton?

Supplementary: And why is that work as a flight attendant, arguably showing considerable resourcefulness in gaming the recruitment requirements, is suppressed from the CV or described as "travelling" in some places, broadens the mind they say, while an undistinguished and actually rather short stint as a State Enrolled Nurse, plus some Agency dabbling possibly, is built up?

Almost beyond recognition? To medical and scientific expertise. Is that fair?

Nadine Dorries MP, How Very Could You? Q89 Lost in Translation

First posted in Nuts in November series 11.48pm 1 December 2009:

We'll finish off the 100 Qs for Nadine this evening. But in the meantime here's one of the Mum-P's web-borne CVs. Complete with links. We'll tidy it up when we have a moment. Meanwhile scroll down. Our question:

Question 89: Have you seen this amusing wokiwiki before?

Nadine Dorries MP
Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire
Incumbent
Assumed office  5 May 2005
Preceded by	Jonathan Sayeed
Majority	11,355 (22.5%)
Born	21 May 1957 (1957-05-21) (age 52) Liverpool, England
Nationality	British
Political party	Conservative
Spouse(s)	Paul Dorries (div. 2006)
Religion	Christian - Anglican

Nadine Vanessa Dorries, née Bargery (born 21 May 1957) is a British Conservative politician, the Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire.

Contents 1 Biography 2 Parliamentary career 2.1 Election record 2.2 Values 2.3 Abortion limit 2.4 Education reform 2.5 Damian McBride Email Affair 2.6 Expenses claims 2.7 High Heels at Work 2.8 All women shortlists 3 References 4 External links 4.1 Audio clips 4.2 News items

Biography

Dorries was built-in as Nadine Bargery in Liverpool, England.

The babe of a bus disciplinarian who died at 42,¹ Dorries was aloft abreast Warrington and accomplished at Rose Heath Primary School² and Halewood Grange Comprehensive Academy (while Alan Bleasdale accomplished there) ³ in Halewood⁴ afore her ancestors confused to Runcorn.² Dorries grew up on a council estate. Her parents took advantage of the "Right to Buy" scheme.⁵⁶ She larboard the Merseyside breadth afterwards she affiliated mining architect Paul Dorries.

Dorries entered nursing in 1975 as a abecedarian at Warrington Accepted Hospital.⁷ From 1978 to 1981, she practised as a nurse in both Warrington and Liverpool.⁸ She claims to accept witnessed two adulterated terminations, an acquaintance that afflicted her attack to lower the foetal aborticide age.⁶

In 1982, she became a medical adumbrative to Ethicla Ltd for a year, afore spending a year in Zambia as the arch of a affiliation school, area her bedmate ran a chestnut mine.¹

In 1987, Dorries became the managing administrator of Aggregation Kids Ltd accouterment adolescent day affliction services. The aggregation was awash in 1998 to BUPA, at which she served as a administrator for a year.⁹

Dorries afar from her bedmate at Christmas 2006; they accept three daughters.¹⁰

Although her great-grandfather, the goalkeeper George Bargery, was one of the founders of Everton Football Club,¹² she is a agog adherent of Liverpool Football Club.¹¹

Parliamentary career

Election record

Dorries abominably contested the constituency of Hazel Grove as Nadine Bargery at the 2001 accepted election, and was defeated by the sitting Liberal Democrat MP Andrew Stunell by 8,435 votes.¹²

Dorries was adopted to the House of Commons at the 2005 accepted election for the safe bench of Mid-Bedfordshire on the retirement through ill bloom afterwards a alternation of scandals of Jonathan Sayeed, with a majority of 11,355, and fabricated her maiden speech on 25 May 2005.¹³

Values

Dorries, declared as "a right-wing, banal Conservative",¹⁴ is a affiliate of the socially bourgeois Cornerstone Group.¹⁵

Abortion limit

On 31 October 2006, Dorries alien a Private Member's Bill, which would accept bargain the time absolute for aborticide from 24 to 21 weeks, accommodate a 'cooling-off' aeon for women adulatory to accept an abortion, and would ensure, afterward the cessation of the cooling off period, accelerated admission to abortion. She accustomed afterlife threats from aborticide rights activists and was accustomed badge protection.¹⁶ Parliament voted by 187 to 108 to adios the bill.¹⁷

In May 2008, she tabled an alteration to the proposed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill gluttonous to abate the top absolute for abortions to 20 weeks from the accepted 24 weeks of pregnancy. Her alteration was defeated by 332 votes to 190, with a abstracted 22 anniversary absolute adjoin by 304 votes to 233 - with MPs continuing to abutment the 24 anniversary limit.¹⁸

Education reform

In May 2007, Dorries criticised David Cameron for blank the recommendations of the Bourgeois accessible activity alive accumulation in favour of grammar schools.¹⁹

Damian McBride Email Affair

In April 2009, Dorries commenced acknowledged activity afterward the advertisement of emails beatific by Damien McBride, Gordon Brown's arch of activity and planning, which appropriate overextension a rumour that Dorries had a one-night angle with a adolescent MP, in an email to Derek Draper, a Labour acknowledging blogger.⁸²⁰²¹ The email was leaked and McBride resigned. Dorries denounced the allegation as libellous and accepted an apology.⁸ Brown afterwards said he was 'sorry' and that he took 'full albatross for what happened'.²²

Expenses claims

In May 2009 the Daily Telegraph, as allotment of its exposure of MPs' costs claims, questioned whether the acreage in Dorries's constituency, on which she claimed £24,222 Additional Costs Allowance (for 'secondary' apartment costs), had been in actuality her capital or alone home from 2007 onwards. ²³ The bi-weekly aswell queried auberge bills including one for 'Mr N Dorries' - these had been disallowed by the Fees Office.

By her own account, Dorries had spent a lot of time in her constituency home, which is aural commuting ambit of Westminster. However, in her blog she complained about the media implying artifice on her part: she bidding abhorrence to accord data of her 'main' home for aloofness reasons, but adumbrated that it was anchored in the Cotswolds. She aswell said she had had adolescent affliction responsibilities alfresco the constituency until 2008 if her youngest babe afflicted schools.

Dorries counter-attacked, alleging abridgement of acceptable acceptance on the allotment of the Daily Telegraph. On 22 May she went on BBC Radio 4 to draw parallels amid the McCarthy 'Witch-Hunts' and the press's 'drip-drip' adumbration of MP's expenses, eliciting responses alignment from abutment from The Independent, David Cameron's accessible criticism, through to acerbity from the public).²⁴ She claimed anybody was fearing a 'suicide', and colleagues were consistently blockage up on anniversary other.²⁵ Later in the day her blog was taken down. It transpired that Withers, attorneys acting for the Barclay Brothers, the owners of the Daily Telegraph, had appropriate the abatement of the blog, on blackmail of aspersion activity adjoin the anniversary provider.²⁶ Dorries did not appear as one of the capital casualties of the costs claims affair, but she was asked to acknowledgment an inappropriate claim.

In November 2009 it was appear that she was application taxpayers' money to apply her babe on a bacon of £28,000. She had ahead complained that her babe would not acquisition application afterwards graduating.²⁷

High Heels at Work

In backward 2009 Nadine Dorries campaigned adjoin what she alleged "a angle to ban the cutting of top heels in the office"²⁸ which was to be debated at the 2009 Trades Union Congress (TUC). The motion, submitted to the TUC by the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists acicular out that "around two actor canicule a year are absent through affection as a aftereffect of lower limb disorders" and that "many administration in the retail area force women workers to abrasion top heels as allotment of their dress code". It did not alarm for a ban on high-heels at work, but rather alleged on administration to accede the health-impact of their dress codes and animate the cutting of healthy, adequate shoes.²⁹

All women shortlists

Nadine Dorries was awful analytical of David Cameron's angle to accede application all women shortlists, allegory her own alternative on arete in Bourgeois Home commodity and arguing adjoin a move which would actualize "two clases of MPs".

She wrote that "Sometimes I feel apologetic for some of the Labour women who were called via all-women shortlists. Anybody knows who they are. They are consistently derided" and gave this anniversary of her 2005 selection:

"Three weeks afore the 2005 accepted acclamation I, a board acreage Scouser, was called as the Bourgeois applicant to represent a southern rural constituency. Because the abstraction occurred so bound and so abutting to D-day, the affair provided my affiliation with a shortlist of seventeen candidates, of which, about 5 were women. Afterward a continued day of interviews in hot brilliant rooms, the anniversary was whittled down to a shortlist of three ... I was abreast that I had been called absolute on the aboriginal acclamation ... That pride, that faculty of achievement, the ability that I was called on the base of my achievement and arete aloft all added candidates on that day is what enables me to authority my arch up top in this place". ³⁰

Dorries anniversary of her own alternative appears to belie a account address which The Times ran at the time of Dorries' alternative in 2005, advertisement that affair address placed a majority of women on the shortlist and apprenticed for the alternative of a changeable candidate:

"Mrs Dorries, who has three boyish children, calmly exhausted her 11 rivals and won the asset safe bench on the aboriginal acclamation at the alternative this weekend. Affair admiral were captivated that the bench has gone to a woman. Previously, alone two women had been called in the 17 safe seats area sitting MPs accept retired. Senior affair abstracts had fabricated bright to bounded dignitaries that they would like the bench to go to a woman and presented the constituency with a shortlist of seven women and 5 men to accentuate the point". ³¹

References

1. ^ ^{a b c} The Tories' Nadine Dorries: Bridget Jones, MP, Telegraph.co.uk (5 November 2007).


2. ^ ^{a b c} 'Great grandfathering George was Everton's aboriginal goalkeeper', Daily Post (Liverpool, 19 April 2008), p. 7.



3. ^ http://www.halewoodcollege.co.uk The academy is now accepted as Halewood College.


4. ^ Meg Carter, 'From PR to Parliament', The Independent (London, 8 January 2007), p. 8.


5. ^ Rosemary Bennett and Helen Rumbelow, 'Tory joy as ex-nurse is best for safe seat', The Times (4 April 2005), p. 26.



6. ^ ^{a b} Nadine Dorries reveals her Bridget Jones moment, Metro.co.uk (29 October 2008).


7. ^ http://www.northcheshirehospitals.nhs.uk


8. ^ ^{a b c} Tory MP Demands Apology, Liverpool Echo, 14 April 2009



9. ^ Carter, 'From PR to Parliament', p. 8.


10. ^ Rebecca Camber, "'Cameron babe' chooses career over husband", Daily Mail 21 January 2007


11. ^ 'Tory MP Demands Apology', Liverpool Echo (14 April 2009), p. 3.



12. ^ http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2001/rp01-054.pdf


13. ^ Hansard at parliament.uk


14. ^ Ian Hernon, 'MPs face boxy vote on blurred aborticide limit', Liverpool Echo (22 March 2008), p. 16.



15. ^ Dorries (2007-02-09). Blog access anachronous 9 February 2007. Retrieved from http://www.dorries.org.uk/Blog.aspx.


16. ^ 'Nadine Dorries, the Pro-Choice MP who Campaigned for Tighter Aborticide Limits, Receives Afterlife Threats', Bedfordshire on Sunday (12 November 2006).


17. ^ Retrieved from http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/files/guide_to_nadine_dorries_tmrb.pdf.



18. ^ BBC NEWS | Politics | MPs aback 24-week limit


19. ^ Cameron set for affray over grammars


20. ^ Guardian | McBride and Draper emails: 'Gents, a few ideas'


21. ^ "Tory MP Nadine Dorries to sue over No10 emails". 25 April 2009. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/conservative/5221070/Tory-MP-Nadine-Dorries-to-sue-over-No10-emails.html. Retrieved 7 May 2009. 



22. ^ Andrew Sparrow, Gordon Brown says apologetic for Damian McBride email smears, guardian.co.uk (16 April 2009).


23. ^ "Tory MP Nadine Dorries admits she alone spends weekends and holidays in her capital home". The Daily Telegraph. 2009-05-15. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5330904/MPs-expenses-Tory-MP-Nadine-Dorries-admits-she-only-spends-weekends-and-holidays-in-her-main-home.html. Retrieved 2009-05-19. 



24. ^ . http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/22/mps-expenses-conservatives. 


25. ^ "MP's fears of costs 'suicide'", BBC News, 22 May 2009.


26. ^ Gaby Hinsliff, Telegraph attorneys shut down Tory MP's blog, guardian.co.uk (23 May 2009).



27. ^ Adrian Butler and Vincent Moss, [1], mirror.co.uk (1 November 2009).


28. ^ Nadine Dorries (6 August 2009). "High Heels". Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5joJGAOtw. Retrieved 15 September 2009. 



29. ^ Trades Union Congress. "Nominations and motions for the 141st anniversary Trades Union Congress 14–17 September, Liverpool". Trades Union Congress. Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5joK9XjxB. Retrieved 15 September 2009. 


30. ^ Nadine Dorries, all-women shortlists will actualize two classes of Bourgeois MP, ConservativeHome (21 October 2009).



31. ^ Rosemary Bennett and Helen Rumbelow, Tory joy as ex-nurse is best for safe seat, The Times (4 April 2005).

External links

• Official site


• Guardian Unlimited Politics - Ask Aristotle: Nadine Dorries MP


• TheyWorkForYou.com - Nadine Dorries MP



• Mid Bedfordshire Conservatives


• BBC Politics page


• BBC Meet the MP in 2005


• Daily Mail Commodity on Daniel Ward


• Dorries' blog in Google's cache

Audio clips

• Discussing aborticide on Radio 4's Woman's Hour in October 2006



• Talking to Mark Darcy of Radio 4's Westminster Hour about aborticide in 2006

News items

• Attempting to lower aborticide time absolute in 2006


• Telegraph article: The World according to Nadine Dorries - November 2007


• Telegraph commodity - Bridget Jones MP - November 2007


• http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/22/mps-expenses-conservatives

Parliament of the United Kingdom
Preceded by Jonathan Sayeed	Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire 2005–present	Incumbent

Nuts in November; Nadine, Q89 Lost in Translation?

We'll finish off the 100 Qs for Nadine this evening. But in the meantime here's one of the Mum-P's web-borne CVs. Complete with links. We'll tidy it up when we have a moment. Meanwhile scroll down. Our question:

Question 89: Have you seen this amusing wokiwiki before?

Nadine Dorries MP
Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire
Incumbent
Assumed office  5 May 2005
Preceded by	Jonathan Sayeed
Majority	11,355 (22.5%)
Born	21 May 1957 (1957-05-21) (age 52) Liverpool, England
Nationality	British
Political party	Conservative
Spouse(s)	Paul Dorries (div. 2006)
Religion	Christian - Anglican

Nadine Vanessa Dorries, née Bargery (born 21 May 1957) is a British Conservative politician, the Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire.

Contents 1 Biography 2 Parliamentary career 2.1 Election record 2.2 Values 2.3 Abortion limit 2.4 Education reform 2.5 Damian McBride Email Affair 2.6 Expenses claims 2.7 High Heels at Work 2.8 All women shortlists 3 References 4 External links 4.1 Audio clips 4.2 News items

Biography

Dorries was built-in as Nadine Bargery in Liverpool, England.

The babe of a bus disciplinarian who died at 42,¹ Dorries was aloft abreast Warrington and accomplished at Rose Heath Primary School² and Halewood Grange Comprehensive Academy (while Alan Bleasdale accomplished there) ³ in Halewood⁴ afore her ancestors confused to Runcorn.² Dorries grew up on a council estate. Her parents took advantage of the "Right to Buy" scheme.⁵⁶ She larboard the Merseyside breadth afterwards she affiliated mining architect Paul Dorries.

Dorries entered nursing in 1975 as a abecedarian at Warrington Accepted Hospital.⁷ From 1978 to 1981, she practised as a nurse in both Warrington and Liverpool.⁸ She claims to accept witnessed two adulterated terminations, an acquaintance that afflicted her attack to lower the foetal aborticide age.⁶

In 1982, she became a medical adumbrative to Ethicla Ltd for a year, afore spending a year in Zambia as the arch of a affiliation school, area her bedmate ran a chestnut mine.¹

In 1987, Dorries became the managing administrator of Aggregation Kids Ltd accouterment adolescent day affliction services. The aggregation was awash in 1998 to BUPA, at which she served as a administrator for a year.⁹

Dorries afar from her bedmate at Christmas 2006; they accept three daughters.¹⁰

Although her great-grandfather, the goalkeeper George Bargery, was one of the founders of Everton Football Club,¹² she is a agog adherent of Liverpool Football Club.¹¹

Parliamentary career

Election record

Dorries abominably contested the constituency of Hazel Grove as Nadine Bargery at the 2001 accepted election, and was defeated by the sitting Liberal Democrat MP Andrew Stunell by 8,435 votes.¹²

Dorries was adopted to the House of Commons at the 2005 accepted election for the safe bench of Mid-Bedfordshire on the retirement through ill bloom afterwards a alternation of scandals of Jonathan Sayeed, with a majority of 11,355, and fabricated her maiden speech on 25 May 2005.¹³

Values

Dorries, declared as "a right-wing, banal Conservative",¹⁴ is a affiliate of the socially bourgeois Cornerstone Group.¹⁵

Abortion limit

On 31 October 2006, Dorries alien a Private Member's Bill, which would accept bargain the time absolute for aborticide from 24 to 21 weeks, accommodate a 'cooling-off' aeon for women adulatory to accept an abortion, and would ensure, afterward the cessation of the cooling off period, accelerated admission to abortion. She accustomed afterlife threats from aborticide rights activists and was accustomed badge protection.¹⁶ Parliament voted by 187 to 108 to adios the bill.¹⁷

In May 2008, she tabled an alteration to the proposed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill gluttonous to abate the top absolute for abortions to 20 weeks from the accepted 24 weeks of pregnancy. Her alteration was defeated by 332 votes to 190, with a abstracted 22 anniversary absolute adjoin by 304 votes to 233 - with MPs continuing to abutment the 24 anniversary limit.¹⁸

Education reform

In May 2007, Dorries criticised David Cameron for blank the recommendations of the Bourgeois accessible activity alive accumulation in favour of grammar schools.¹⁹

Damian McBride Email Affair

In April 2009, Dorries commenced acknowledged activity afterward the advertisement of emails beatific by Damien McBride, Gordon Brown's arch of activity and planning, which appropriate overextension a rumour that Dorries had a one-night angle with a adolescent MP, in an email to Derek Draper, a Labour acknowledging blogger.⁸²⁰²¹ The email was leaked and McBride resigned. Dorries denounced the allegation as libellous and accepted an apology.⁸ Brown afterwards said he was 'sorry' and that he took 'full albatross for what happened'.²²

Expenses claims

In May 2009 the Daily Telegraph, as allotment of its exposure of MPs' costs claims, questioned whether the acreage in Dorries's constituency, on which she claimed £24,222 Additional Costs Allowance (for 'secondary' apartment costs), had been in actuality her capital or alone home from 2007 onwards. ²³ The bi-weekly aswell queried auberge bills including one for 'Mr N Dorries' - these had been disallowed by the Fees Office.

By her own account, Dorries had spent a lot of time in her constituency home, which is aural commuting ambit of Westminster. However, in her blog she complained about the media implying artifice on her part: she bidding abhorrence to accord data of her 'main' home for aloofness reasons, but adumbrated that it was anchored in the Cotswolds. She aswell said she had had adolescent affliction responsibilities alfresco the constituency until 2008 if her youngest babe afflicted schools.

Dorries counter-attacked, alleging abridgement of acceptable acceptance on the allotment of the Daily Telegraph. On 22 May she went on BBC Radio 4 to draw parallels amid the McCarthy 'Witch-Hunts' and the press's 'drip-drip' adumbration of MP's expenses, eliciting responses alignment from abutment from The Independent, David Cameron's accessible criticism, through to acerbity from the public).²⁴ She claimed anybody was fearing a 'suicide', and colleagues were consistently blockage up on anniversary other.²⁵ Later in the day her blog was taken down. It transpired that Withers, attorneys acting for the Barclay Brothers, the owners of the Daily Telegraph, had appropriate the abatement of the blog, on blackmail of aspersion activity adjoin the anniversary provider.²⁶ Dorries did not appear as one of the capital casualties of the costs claims affair, but she was asked to acknowledgment an inappropriate claim.

In November 2009 it was appear that she was application taxpayers' money to apply her babe on a bacon of £28,000. She had ahead complained that her babe would not acquisition application afterwards graduating.²⁷

High Heels at Work

In backward 2009 Nadine Dorries campaigned adjoin what she alleged "a angle to ban the cutting of top heels in the office"²⁸ which was to be debated at the 2009 Trades Union Congress (TUC). The motion, submitted to the TUC by the Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists acicular out that "around two actor canicule a year are absent through affection as a aftereffect of lower limb disorders" and that "many administration in the retail area force women workers to abrasion top heels as allotment of their dress code". It did not alarm for a ban on high-heels at work, but rather alleged on administration to accede the health-impact of their dress codes and animate the cutting of healthy, adequate shoes.²⁹

All women shortlists

Nadine Dorries was awful analytical of David Cameron's angle to accede application all women shortlists, allegory her own alternative on arete in Bourgeois Home commodity and arguing adjoin a move which would actualize "two clases of MPs".

She wrote that "Sometimes I feel apologetic for some of the Labour women who were called via all-women shortlists. Anybody knows who they are. They are consistently derided" and gave this anniversary of her 2005 selection:

"Three weeks afore the 2005 accepted acclamation I, a board acreage Scouser, was called as the Bourgeois applicant to represent a southern rural constituency. Because the abstraction occurred so bound and so abutting to D-day, the affair provided my affiliation with a shortlist of seventeen candidates, of which, about 5 were women. Afterward a continued day of interviews in hot brilliant rooms, the anniversary was whittled down to a shortlist of three ... I was abreast that I had been called absolute on the aboriginal acclamation ... That pride, that faculty of achievement, the ability that I was called on the base of my achievement and arete aloft all added candidates on that day is what enables me to authority my arch up top in this place". ³⁰

Dorries anniversary of her own alternative appears to belie a account address which The Times ran at the time of Dorries' alternative in 2005, advertisement that affair address placed a majority of women on the shortlist and apprenticed for the alternative of a changeable candidate:

"Mrs Dorries, who has three boyish children, calmly exhausted her 11 rivals and won the asset safe bench on the aboriginal acclamation at the alternative this weekend. Affair admiral were captivated that the bench has gone to a woman. Previously, alone two women had been called in the 17 safe seats area sitting MPs accept retired. Senior affair abstracts had fabricated bright to bounded dignitaries that they would like the bench to go to a woman and presented the constituency with a shortlist of seven women and 5 men to accentuate the point". ³¹

References

1. ^ ^{a b c} The Tories' Nadine Dorries: Bridget Jones, MP, Telegraph.co.uk (5 November 2007).


2. ^ ^{a b c} 'Great grandfathering George was Everton's aboriginal goalkeeper', Daily Post (Liverpool, 19 April 2008), p. 7.



3. ^ http://www.halewoodcollege.co.uk The academy is now accepted as Halewood College.


4. ^ Meg Carter, 'From PR to Parliament', The Independent (London, 8 January 2007), p. 8.


5. ^ Rosemary Bennett and Helen Rumbelow, 'Tory joy as ex-nurse is best for safe seat', The Times (4 April 2005), p. 26.



6. ^ ^{a b} Nadine Dorries reveals her Bridget Jones moment, Metro.co.uk (29 October 2008).


7. ^ http://www.northcheshirehospitals.nhs.uk


8. ^ ^{a b c} Tory MP Demands Apology, Liverpool Echo, 14 April 2009



9. ^ Carter, 'From PR to Parliament', p. 8.


10. ^ Rebecca Camber, "'Cameron babe' chooses career over husband", Daily Mail 21 January 2007


11. ^ 'Tory MP Demands Apology', Liverpool Echo (14 April 2009), p. 3.



12. ^ http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2001/rp01-054.pdf


13. ^ Hansard at parliament.uk


14. ^ Ian Hernon, 'MPs face boxy vote on blurred aborticide limit', Liverpool Echo (22 March 2008), p. 16.



15. ^ Dorries (2007-02-09). Blog access anachronous 9 February 2007. Retrieved from http://www.dorries.org.uk/Blog.aspx.


16. ^ 'Nadine Dorries, the Pro-Choice MP who Campaigned for Tighter Aborticide Limits, Receives Afterlife Threats', Bedfordshire on Sunday (12 November 2006).


17. ^ Retrieved from http://conservativehome.blogs.com/torydiary/files/guide_to_nadine_dorries_tmrb.pdf.



18. ^ BBC NEWS | Politics | MPs aback 24-week limit


19. ^ Cameron set for affray over grammars


20. ^ Guardian | McBride and Draper emails: 'Gents, a few ideas'


21. ^ "Tory MP Nadine Dorries to sue over No10 emails". 25 April 2009. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/conservative/5221070/Tory-MP-Nadine-Dorries-to-sue-over-No10-emails.html. Retrieved 7 May 2009. 



22. ^ Andrew Sparrow, Gordon Brown says apologetic for Damian McBride email smears, guardian.co.uk (16 April 2009).


23. ^ "Tory MP Nadine Dorries admits she alone spends weekends and holidays in her capital home". The Daily Telegraph. 2009-05-15. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5330904/MPs-expenses-Tory-MP-Nadine-Dorries-admits-she-only-spends-weekends-and-holidays-in-her-main-home.html. Retrieved 2009-05-19. 



24. ^ . http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/22/mps-expenses-conservatives. 


25. ^ "MP's fears of costs 'suicide'", BBC News, 22 May 2009.


26. ^ Gaby Hinsliff, Telegraph attorneys shut down Tory MP's blog, guardian.co.uk (23 May 2009).



27. ^ Adrian Butler and Vincent Moss, [1], mirror.co.uk (1 November 2009).


28. ^ Nadine Dorries (6 August 2009). "High Heels". Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5joJGAOtw. Retrieved 15 September 2009. 



29. ^ Trades Union Congress. "Nominations and motions for the 141st anniversary Trades Union Congress 14–17 September, Liverpool". Trades Union Congress. Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/5joK9XjxB. Retrieved 15 September 2009. 


30. ^ Nadine Dorries, all-women shortlists will actualize two classes of Bourgeois MP, ConservativeHome (21 October 2009).



31. ^ Rosemary Bennett and Helen Rumbelow, Tory joy as ex-nurse is best for safe seat, The Times (4 April 2005).

External links

• Official site


• Guardian Unlimited Politics - Ask Aristotle: Nadine Dorries MP


• TheyWorkForYou.com - Nadine Dorries MP



• Mid Bedfordshire Conservatives


• BBC Politics page


• BBC Meet the MP in 2005


• Daily Mail Commodity on Daniel Ward


• Dorries' blog in Google's cache

Audio clips

• Discussing aborticide on Radio 4's Woman's Hour in October 2006



• Talking to Mark Darcy of Radio 4's Westminster Hour about aborticide in 2006

News items

• Attempting to lower aborticide time absolute in 2006


• Telegraph article: The World according to Nadine Dorries - November 2007


• Telegraph commodity - Bridget Jones MP - November 2007


• http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/22/mps-expenses-conservatives

Parliament of the United Kingdom
Preceded by Jonathan Sayeed	Member of Parliament for Mid Bedfordshire 2005–present	Incumbent