Finance and economics | Peer-to-peer lending

Banking without banks

By offering both borrowers and lenders a better deal, websites that put the two together are challenging retail banks

SAVERS have never had a worse deal but for most borrowers, credit is scarce and costly. That seeming paradox attracts new businesses free of the bad balance sheets, high costs and dreadful reputations which burden most conventional banks.

Foremost among the newcomers are peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms, which match borrowers and lenders directly, usually via online auctions. The loans issued often comprise many tiny slivers from different lenders. Some P2P platforms slice, dice and package the loans; others allow lenders to pick them. Either way, the result is a strikingly better deal for both sides. Zopa, a British P2P platform, offers 4.9% to lenders (most bank accounts pay nothing) and typically charges 5.6% on a personal loan (which is competitive with the rates most banks charge).

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Banking without banks"

What’s gone wrong with democracy

From the March 1st 2014 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

What campus protesters get wrong about divestment

Will withdrawing money hurt Israel?

Hedge funds make billions as India’s options market goes ballistic

The country’s retail investors are doing less well


Russia’s gas business will never recover from the war in Ukraine

Hopes of a Chinese rescue look increasingly vain