It is an application for a stay, so likely an effort to stay the lower courts’ refusal to quash the subpoena and halt the continuing fines on the company for not complying (similar to what was sought in the DC Circuit).
-
-
Visa denna tråd
-
On Thursday and Friday, note that there was sealed action in the case, at the DC Circuit, leading up to today’s
#SCOTUS filing:https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/1076228672737239043?s=21 …Visa denna tråd -
Here was a smart guess at what those happenings were about:https://twitter.com/joshindenver/status/1076179097556926464?s=21 …
Visa denna tråd
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
I'm sticking with Cambridge Analitica - or whatever they call themselves these days.
-
No they say it’s a company owned by a country. Think Russian bank!
-
A Russian company would ignore a US subpoena. This could be Qatari or someone else
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
Deutsch Bank?
-
They aren’t owned by the German government. Un-BINGO
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
SCOTUS hears sealed cases?
- Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
-
Qatar- Mueller wouldn’t bother subpoenaing Russians
Slut på konversationen
Ny konversation -
-
Is this the first time SCOTUS has gotten involved in the Mueller thing? (If this is indeed Mueller)
-
You -- such a bloodhound!
- 1 mer svar
Ny konversation -
-
-
Is this the case that cleared the 5th floor of the courthouse?
- 1 mer svar
Ny konversation -
Hämtningen verkar ta ett tag
Twitter kan vara överbelastat eller ha tillfälliga problem. Försök igen eller besök Twitter Status om du vill ha mer information.